《不安》讲述什么样的故事?
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.
1、《不安》在什么年份上映的?
《不安》是罗伯托·罗西里尼于1954年拍摄上映面向大众的一部精彩剧情片。这部片开创了其它这个时代剧情片的先河,《不安》上映时票房稳稳居于国内外前三的位置,创下当年播放记录。在那个时代英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特均为最佳演技实力派,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特以完美的演技和好看的形象,奠定在其它影视的大咖地位。英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特饰演角色在完播后依然被大众模仿。罗伯托·罗西里尼之前曾被观众怀疑过演技能力,而《不安》却奠定罗伯托·罗西里尼剧情片别样风格。《不安》国外首映时曾获剧情片和媒体广泛报道,被认为其优秀程度,是完全能与同时期(指1980年代)好莱坞优秀剧情片齐名。
2、被称为剧情片的巅峰之作的《不安》,是罗伯托·罗西里尼最好的作品之一吗?
从罗伯托·罗西里尼斩获剧情片最佳导演奖,我就觉得这部《不安》是他最好的剧情片。虽然罗伯托·罗西里尼后来还拍出来了8分评价剧情片,但是《不安》是他剧情片的经典作品之一。
3、《不安》为什么能成为巅峰之作?
提起其它剧情片,大众肯定会想到《不安》的名字。这部由罗伯托·罗西里尼导演,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特主演的《不安》,在当时,真的是成为了一匹黑马,杀出了一条血路,创造了一个奇迹。为何会这么说,我想,就连罗伯托·罗西里尼导演和英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,都没想到这部剧情片会得到这样好的反响。罗伯托·罗西里尼老师曾说过,这是一群失意的人凑到一起创作出来的一部巨品。因为在《不安》拍摄之前,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特已经有多年无戏可拍,而英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特主演的剧情片,票房始终不理想,这样的几个人凑在了一起,也真是缘分!所以,正是这样的失意感和强烈的自尊心,他们在剧情片中投入的激情,是我们无法想象的,其实《不安》中的人物心理历程和感人的剧情,何尝不是现实中人们无赖的真实写照呢?所以,他们怀着一腔心有不甘的英雄气,用他们的实力成就了这部经典剧情片,也成就了他们自己!
4、媒体如何评价《不安》?
《不安》口碑好同时又深受广大观众喜爱,《不安》一经播放立刻引来关注,不仅英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特演的好而且该剧情片故事情节也非常紧凑,奇优影院(www.naummedovoy.com)观看起来特别流畅同时还能扣人心弦,即使目前《不安》收视率不佳但是该片目前受欢迎程度已经蒸蒸日上。该剧情片主演英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,她在该剧情片中的演技可圈可点,受到英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特演的好而且该剧情片迷的认可。
5、《不安》剧情片的主要内容
《不安》是一部剧情片剧情片,由导演:罗伯托·罗西里尼执导,主演:英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.
6、《不安》是罗伯托·罗西里尼导演的一部经典的剧情其它片大全,该剧讲述了:Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the oth,想看更多的相关影视作品,请收藏我们的网站:www.naummedovoy.com
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.